Effect of drought stress on morpho-physiological traits in some traditional rice cultivars of Kokrajhar district, Assam, India
Abstract
Water status is one of the critical factors affecting rice production. Rice cultivars tolerant to drought stress at the vegetative stage were selected. Six traditional rice cultivars of Kokrajhar district, Assam, namely, Sali, Bora, Ahu, Malsira, and two variety of Jaha i.e.; white and black were included in this study. The germination index, plant growth, root architecture, leaf rolling, leaf death and leaf relative water content in plants subjected to drought stress for 0, 7, 14 and 21 days were recorded. Based upon the levels of water stress tolerance, three groups of rice cultivars were recognized, as follows: highly drought-tolerant, moderately drought-tolerant and drought-sensitive cultivars. The Joha (white) rice cultivar was considered to be a highly drought-tolerant cultivar. The moderately drought-tolerant cultivars included Joha (black), Ahu, Sali and Bora. The Malsira cultivar was considered sensitive to drought.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Achari, Basudeb, Chakrabarty, Sarmistha, Pakrashi, Satyesh C., An N-glycoside and steroids from Aristolochia indica. Phytochem. 20, (1981): 1444-1445.
Boyer, John S., Advances in drought tolerence in plants. Adv. Agron. 56, (1996): 187-218.
Chutia, Jnanadabhiram, Borah, Sailendra P., Tanti, Bhaben, Effect of drought stress on protein and proline metabolism in seven traditional rice (Oryza sativa Linn.) genotypes of Assam, India. J. Res. Biol. 2.3, (2012): 206-214.
Darofeev, V.F., Tyselano, A.M., Number of seminal roots in spring wheat in the course of selecting pair for hybridization. Vestnik Selokokhozysist. 8, (1982): 50-56.
Datta, Surajit K. De., Chang, T.T., Yoshida, S., Drought tolerance in upland rice. Major Res. Upland Rice. IIRI, Los Bonos, Languna, Philippines, (1975): pp. 101-105.
Dingkuhn, M., Cruz, R.T., O’Toole, L.C., Turner, N.C., Doerffling, K., Responses of seven diverse rice cultivars to water deficits. III. Accumulation of abscisic acid and proline in relation to leaf water-potential and osmotic adjustment. Field Crops Res. 27, (1991): 103–117.
Evans, L.T., Wardlaw, I.F., Fisher, R.A., In: Crop Physiologysome case stories. Evans L.T. (ed.), Cambridge University Press, London, (1975): pp. 101-149.
Farooq, M., Wahid, A., Kobayashi, N., Fujita, D., Basra, S.M.A., Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 29, (2009): 185–212.
Foley, J.A., Ramankutty, N., Braumann, K.A., Cassidy, E.S., Gerber, J.S., Johnston, M., Mueller, N.D., O’Connell, C., Ray, D.K., West, P.C., Balzer, C., Bennett, E.M., Carpenter, S.R., Hill, J., Monfreda, C., Polasky, S., Rockström, J., Sheehan, J., Siebert, S., Tilman, D., Zaks, D.P.M., Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature. 478, (2011): 337–342.
Hanson, A.D., Peacock, W.J., Evans, L.T., Arntzen, C.J., Khus, G.S., Development of drought resistant cultivars using physiomorphological traits in rice. (eds. Fukai S. and Cooper M.). Field Crop Res. 40, (1995): 67-86.
Hsiao, T.C., O’Toole, J.C., Yambao, E.B., Turner, N.C., Influence of osmotic adjustment on leaf rolling and tissue death in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Physiol. 75, (1984): 338-341. doi:10.1104/pp.75.2.338.
Khush, G.S., What it will take to feed 5.0 billion rice consumers in 2030. Plant Mol. Biol. 59, (2005): 1-6.
Munns, R., Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ. 25, (2002): 239-250.
Nguyen, H.T., Babu, R.C., Blum, A., Breeding for drought resistance in rice: Physiological and molecular genetics considerations. Crop Sci. 37, (1997): 1426–1434.
Sarkarung, S., Pantuwan, G., Improving rice for drought prone rain fed lowland environment. In: ito, O., O ̓ Toole, J.C., Hardy, B. (Eds.), Genetic Improvement of Rice for Water limited Environments. International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Philippines, (1999): pp. 57-70.
Sharif-zadeh, F., Mohsen, J., Influence of priming techniques on seed germination behavior of maize inbreed lines (Zea mays L.). J. Agri and Bio Sci. 3, (2008): 22-25.
Singh, H., Mackil, l.K.T., Sensitivity of rice to water deficit at different growth stages. Phil. Crop Sci. 16(suppl.no.10), (1991): S11.
Sigari, A., Wadel, L.J., Yamauch, A., “Response of Roots Traits of Rainfed Lowland Rice to Drought and Rewatering,” In: J. Abe and S. Morita, Eds., Root System Management that Leads to Maximize Rice Yields, JSRR, Tokyo. (1997): pp. 132-140.
Slavick, B., Methods of studying plant water relation. Springer-Verlang. New York. (1979): pp. 1114-1120.
Slayter, R.O., The effect of internal water status on plant growth, development and yield. In: Plant Response to Climatic Factors. Slayter, R.O. (eds.). Proc. Uppsala Symp. UNESCO, Paris. (1973): pp. 177-191.
O’Neal, M., Douglas, A.L., Rufus, I., An inexpensive, Accurate Method for Measuring Leaf Area and Defoliation through Digital Image Analysis. J. Entomol. 95, (2002): 1190-1194.
Wang, J.H., Geng, L.H., Zhang, C.M., Research on the weak signal detecting technique for crop water stress based on wavelet denoising. Adv Mat Res. 424/425, (2012): 966–970.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21746/aps.2016.08.003
Copyright (c) 2016 Annals of Plant Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.